Not because they reflect and give each other substance, but because they are each other: facing fears with courage, presenting a narrative when no one cares, making it up to them afterward, just forgetting it after remembering for a long while.
Around this time last year, I was watching a bike light peer through the dusk, wheeling down a dirt path saturated with that evening’s blue-gold color scheme. Sunbeams — all spectral and river-bent and free-falling ultraviolet — plunged into the Landwehrkanal.
My cloud eyes closed for a blink.
Opening again, they revealed a refracted version of what was previously there: a lawn, a path, a canal that flowed like a continuum and ended on the same one.
Disaster relief agencies and environmentalists were quick to respond.
In the evening of Monday, July 23, an auxiliary dam of the Xe-Pian Xe-Namnoy hydropower scheme in southern Laos’ Attapeu Province collapsed from monsoon rains that overwhelmed its holding capacity. Local communities had just hours or less to evacuate to higher ground before a torrent of reservoir water rushed downstream, submerging their houses and temples and washing away their livelihoods overnight. Initial reports put the number of displaced residents at over 6,000, with many killed or missing and countless still trapped without food or water on roofs and in trees. Fortunately, NGOs like Vientiane Rescue were ready to respond – but need your help to continue.
Based in Laos’ capital, Vientiane Rescue operates a free ambulance service staffed by volunteers and funded entirely by private donations. They provide a desperately needed EMS service in a city where driving-related injuries and deaths have soared in recent years. Since its founding in 2010, Vientiane Rescue has expanded operations to the southern city of Pakse and widened the scope of their services. They now operate fire rescue and diving rescue teams. The organization won a highly prestigious Ramon Magsaysay prize and dedicated it to the Lao people, and recently made headlines by helping save 12 boys trapped in a cave in Chiang Rai, Thailand.
Look no further than these organizations’ Facebook pages to have your faith in humanity restored. The outpouring of generosity and solidarity supporting these organizations in their first response efforts was awe-inspiring. One fundraiser hosted by Banque Pour le Commerce Exterieur Lao (BCEL) raised nearly double its ₭2 billion LAK ($238,000 USD) fundraising goal within a week. United States-based organizations like The SEAD Project and Indigo Threads mobilized their networks to raise thousands of dollars each.
Relief efforts are still underway and in need of further help. One week after the dam collapse, rescue teams were only been able to cover a third of the affected area. For those with the means to assist, there are several ways to do so:
Donate directly to any of these reputable organizations in Laos:
Like, follow, and spread the word on social media about these orgs’ good work.
Stay informed about the #LaosDamCollapse and your global neighbors in Laos.
Advocacy group International Rivers has criticized the company’s failure to implement an adequate early warning system and safeguard against the climate-change-linked storms that toppled the dam.
Some steps have been taken to remedy the disaster in Attapeu. SK Engineering & Construction Co., Ltd., the South Korean majority shareholder in the power company operating the Xe-Pian Xe-Namnoy hydropower scheme, provided assistance in initial relief efforts and will accept culpability after the ongoing probe into the cause of the breach is completed. This government-led investigation will inspect all planned dams in Laos and review the country’s overall hydropower strategy. Meanwhile, the longer-term reconstruction phase in Attapeu has started by building temporary settlements and will allegedly compensate residents of the 13 flood-affected villages for their lost land. Funding for this will come from the Xe-Pian Xe-Namnoy power company, although it’s unclear how compensation will address social justice concerns, as the lives lost from the collapse can never be replaced.
Originally written for (Co)Action Lab and reprinted here with permission.
Not certain if my memory of Phongsaly is real or fake.
Because the ends and starts of the conversations I observed in Moutern seemed similar enough that I think I might be misremembering the whole thing.
In my memory, discussions followed a schematic: a greeting and introduction (delivered in a particular fashion and with particular physical posturing), then the conversation proper (when the back-forth of the speakers’ exchange falls into a repetitive pattern where one person speaks while the other listens and performs reactive acknowledgement), and finally the winding down of the speaking (when sentences are short and staccato until one party chooses silence).
The beginnings and ends, with their apparently more defined behavioral rules, seemed to resemble each other because of those rules — likely because I couldn’t understand a single word being spoken.